CSRD double materiality template in Excel: what the assessment has to contain, and a workbook that does it

If your company reports under the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive, the double materiality assessment is the first thing the report rests on and the first thing the assurance provider tests. This page sets out what the assessment must contain under ESRS 1, with the section cited for each part, and shows the Excel workbook Bindler built to run it. It is a working method, not legal advice.

Who has to do one

CSRD (Directive (EU) 2022/2464) requires companies in scope to report under the European Sustainability Reporting Standards, adopted by Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2772. Scope was narrowed by Directive (EU) 2026/470 (Omnibus I, in the Official Journal on 26 February 2026): from financial year 2027 a company reports when it exceeds 1 000 employees and EUR 450 million net turnover. Companies already reporting for FY2024 stay in for three financial years, with a Member State option to exempt those below the new thresholds for FY2025 and FY2026. If you are not sure which side of the line you are on, the $1 CSRD Size Test applies the thresholds to your figures and names the article.

The two perspectives

ESRS 1 requires every sustainability matter to be assessed from two directions, and a matter is material if it passes either test (ESRS 1, section 3.3, paragraph 28):

A template that scores only one axis, or that merges the two into a single number, does not meet the standard.

What the register needs, row by row

The unit of the assessment is the impact, risk or opportunity, the IRO. ESRS 1 gives the scoring factors:

PerspectiveWhat is scoredFactors (ESRS 1)
Negative impactseverity, then likelihood if the impact is potentialscale, scope, irremediable character (section 3.4, paragraph 45)
Positive impactseverity, then likelihood if potentialscale and scope (section 3.4, paragraph 46)
Risk or opportunitymagnitude of the financial effect and its likelihoodsection 3.5, paragraph 51

So each row of a register needs: the ESRS topic and sub-topic, the type (negative impact, positive impact, risk, opportunity), where it sits in the value chain, the time horizon, whether it is actual or potential, the scores, and the two columns an assurance provider will ask for first: the stakeholders consulted and the evidence.

Thresholds are a governance decision

ESRS 1 does not set a numeric threshold. It requires the company to set thresholds for both perspectives, apply them consistently, and disclose them (ESRS 2, IRO-1). A common practice is a 1 to 5 scale on each factor with a cut-off around the middle, but the number is yours to set and to justify. Write down why. The assurance provider tests how you reached the conclusion, not just the conclusion.

From IRO to topic: which standards you report

A topical standard (E1 to E5, S1 to S4, G1) must be reported in full when at least one IRO under it is material. A topic assessed as not material may be omitted with a brief explanation, except climate change: if E1 is concluded not material, ESRS 1 paragraph 32 requires a detailed explanation of that conclusion. The assessment therefore has to roll up from the IRO rows to a per-topic conclusion, not stop at the register.

The workbook

The CSRD Double Materiality Assessment workbook does the above with live formulas, no macros, no locked cells. Five sheets:

IRO Register sheet of the CSRD Double Materiality Assessment workbook
IRO Register: one row per impact, risk or opportunity; the flags are formulas.
Topic summary sheet: which ESRS topical standards are material
Topic summary: the per-topic conclusion rolled up from the register.
Thresholds sheet: scoring scales and the two materiality thresholds
Thresholds: both cut-offs are inputs, and the scales are written down.

How it is scored: severity of a negative impact is the average of scale, scope and irremediability; of a positive impact, the average of scale and scope. A potential impact's score is severity multiplied by likelihood divided by 5; an actual impact keeps its severity. The financial score is magnitude multiplied by likelihood divided by 5. Each score is compared with its threshold on the Thresholds sheet. The workbook was recalculated with a formula engine and checked against a Python replica on eight worked IROs at two threshold settings before listing; the German (CSRD Wesentlichkeitsanalyse) and French (CSRD Analyse de double matérialité) editions carry the same formulas and were verified against the English file.

What it does not do

It does not identify your IROs for you: that is the stakeholder and value-chain work ESRS 1 section 3.4 asks for. It does not produce the ESRS 2 IRO-1 narrative, though the register and thresholds are the content of it. And it does not decide the thresholds; it makes them explicit.

Sources

CSRD Double Materiality Assessment Workbook (ESRS 1 method)Run the ESRS double materiality assessment, score every impact, risk and opportunity, and get told which topical standards you must report.
See the workbook, $39

Search terms this page answers: csrd double materiality template excel, esrs materiality assessment template, iro register excel, double materiality matrix template, esrs 1 impact materiality scoring.

New workbooks and updates by email

One email when a new workbook ships or a regulation changes a template. No filler. Sent through Gumroad, unsubscribe in one click.

You can unsubscribe from any email.